
So I knew my artwork was not worth over what professors thought about politics (over which they could only banter). But I never could stop that addiction. A pen and paper nearby meant fingers that itched to write or draw or paint. Well, they still were artwork to me. I drew families of four, a dad, a mom, a brother, a sister; the sister always the younger. I drew cats that looked like pigs and pigs that looked like babies. I just was a miserable artist addicted to scribbling what to the onlooker never seemed much of artwork. But then people needed to know what it was that I intended...pig or baby. When I grew tired of trying to explain, I decided to keep silent since I too felt the baby I drew looked more piggy than babyish.
But there was this 'masterpiece', right from my first form I drew a lady's visage which even my dad wanted to know who it was about. Since that was one artwork that met its intention I drew it away with angular variations. I drew that face wherever I could,on school ground, on walls, between pages...with sticks, chalk and pencils. It took me less than a minute to complete the visage and infuriated most people with a meaningful aesthetic sense, and er.. it still does...
![]() |
You drew that? Like The Rossetti girl, the Anusha Girl?
ReplyDeleteLollypop, the eyes are still the same. You still at it?
ReplyDeleteA brush in the hands of writer?
ReplyDeleteWell, you are a good painter too.
Keep doing the good work.
Sandeep, that is too far a comparison!
ReplyDeleteSowmya,addicted still.
ReplyDeleteSir, thank you.
ReplyDelete